05-02-2016, 06:42 PM
The Constitution? That old thing? Well, some smart liberal cookie (liberals LOVE regulation) started a whispering campaign to the effect of "Hey, that old thing was written by guys who have been dead for hundreds of years, society has changed, and while some of what's in it is good, it really should be considered a "living document", open to interpretation by the reader that reinforces their point of view" - And only then pointed to righteously as the basis of an argument.
This idea has been promulgated by liberal law professors for so long, during their long march through the institutions, that it is now accepted as fact.
2004: "Let me introduce you to this nice fellow, visiting professor of Constitutional law at UC, just a wonderful young man..."
2009: "Did the president just completely ignore the rules regarding the separation of powers set out in the Constitution? What, the legislative and judicial branches can just stay home now, he's "got this"?"
2012: "The heck did he just say about having a pen and a phone? And we're just going to allow this?
2016: "Please, O sweet meteor of death (SMOD), come for us soon - There's another Clinton in the oval office and MAN does she have a chip on her shoulder."
This idea has been promulgated by liberal law professors for so long, during their long march through the institutions, that it is now accepted as fact.
2004: "Let me introduce you to this nice fellow, visiting professor of Constitutional law at UC, just a wonderful young man..."
2009: "Did the president just completely ignore the rules regarding the separation of powers set out in the Constitution? What, the legislative and judicial branches can just stay home now, he's "got this"?"
2012: "The heck did he just say about having a pen and a phone? And we're just going to allow this?
2016: "Please, O sweet meteor of death (SMOD), come for us soon - There's another Clinton in the oval office and MAN does she have a chip on her shoulder."