06-18-2020, 05:50 PM
Muslim Screaming ‘Allahu Akbar’
Stabs NYPD Cop in the Neck:
The Leftist/Jihadist Alliance
in Action
BY ROBERT SPENCER JUN 06, 2020 7:17 PM EST
![[Image: unnamed-9-730x487.jpg]](https://pjmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/unnamed-9-730x487.jpg)
Dzenan Camovic, 20, allegedly stabbed a NYPD officer in Brooklyn in the neck on Wednesday.
The riots in New York City have now given us two examples of the
Leftist/jihadist alliance: Urooj Rahman, a Muslim lawyer and activist
for the Palestinian jihad, threw a Molotov cocktail into a police cruiser,
and last Wednesday night in Brooklyn, a Muslim migrant from Bosnia
named Dzenan Camovic stabbed a NYPD officer, Yayonfrant Jean Pierre,
in the neck while screaming “Allahu akbar.”
Camovic’s attack was duly woke: he attacked the officer while he was
guarding Brooklyn businesses against looters, and we all know now
that anyone who has the temerity to clean up after the looters, or to
get in their way while they are expressing their righteousness, is a
racist who must be destroyed.
The manner of Camovic’s attack reveals the other side of the alliance.
It is unlikely to have been accidental that he stabbed the police officer
in the neck: the Qur’an tells Muslims, “When you meet the unbelievers,
strike the necks” (47:4). Striking their victims specifically in the neck is,
accordingly, a hallmark of jihadis worldwide.
While jihad attacks by Muslims screaming “Allahu akbar” is an
unfortunately recurring feature of contemporary life, particularly
in Europe, Camovic chose an especially opportune time to attack a
police officer, when amid all the hysterical frenzy over supposed
police “racism,” he could be assured of a legion of sympathetic admirers.
Maybe Salmah Rizvi, a Muslim lawyer who has received a Council on
American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) scholarship and a Soros fellowship
and who guaranteed bail for her “best friend” Urooj Rahman, could take
Camovic’s case and argue that, well, yes, he did attack a police officer
while screaming “Allahu akbar,” but “Allahu akbar” is simply a beautiful
expression of the greatness of God, and as for the attack on police,
well, these racists have it coming, don’t they? For good measure,
Rizvi could even argue that Camovic, a migrant, was simply lashing
out at Trump-era anti-immigrant nativism and fascism.
That kind of defense could have Camovic out on the
street again in no time.
In the meantime, the possibility that Camovic has links to jihad terror
groups is being investigated. Amid that investigation, one of his
relatives, unnamed in a New York Daily News report, is showing
that despite being an immigrant, he or she already knows how to
play the victim card that Islamic advocacy groups and their Leftist
allies in the United States so skillfully and frequently deploy. When
asked about whether Camovic had any ties to terror groups, the
relative responded emphatically: “Absolutely not.” And he laid the
victimhood on thick: “I have the utmost respect for law enforcement,
but it’s easy to accuse a Muslim of terrorism. It’s the first offense
that comes to mind when someone mentions Muslim. He might have
been attacked yesterday. He could have been provoked, and he might
have mentioned, like anyone would mention, God. He might have
said Allah, but no one knows. I just hope law enforcement will do
their due diligence.”
Camovic “could have been provoked, and he might have mentioned,
like anyone would mention, God. He might have said Allah.” Sure, pal.
That’s it. But in reality, there is abundant evidence that “Allahu akbar”
(“Allah is greater,” i.e., superior to your god, your government, and
any other authority) signifies something much more sinister than that.
Chief 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta wrote in his letter to himself before
carrying out his jihad mission: “When the confrontation begins, strike
like champions who do not want to go back to this world.
Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the
non-believers.” The Fort Hood jihad killer, Nidal Malik Hasan, shouted
it as he shot thirteen Americans in November 2009. Numerous other
jihadis have used it essentially as an announcement that non-Muslims
are about to die.
But few people in America today are aware of this. That is in part due
to the establishment media’s full-court press a few years ago to convince
Americans that “Allahu akbar” was a benign phrase that only greasy
Islamophobes could possibly be concerned about.
In the New York Daily News, Zainab Chaudry of Hamas-linked CAIR
argued that non-Muslims shouldn’t “believe the worst” about “Allahu akbar”
because Muslims don’t just scream it while murdering non-Muslims,
but use it in a variety of contexts. She even offered this chilling advice,
certain to get people killed were it ever heeded: “So the next time you
hear Allahu Akbar — whether it’s in a media report, on an airplane,
or in a shopping mall, remember that the phrase used by millions of Muslims
and Christians daily to praise God regardless of their circumstances,
can never be justified for use when harming His creation.” So stay put;
evidently, fleeing would be “Islamophobic.”
On CNN, Omar Suleiman — the imam who prevailed upon Google to alter
their search results so as to bury any negative information about
Islam — also argued that Muslims say “Allahu akbar” in a variety of contexts,
many of them positive. And the New York Times actually tweeted that
the phrase “Allahu akbar” had “somehow” become “intertwined with terrorism.”
Somehow! How could this have possibly happened? Could it have anything
to do with the thousands of Muslims who have screamed “Allahu akbar”
while in the process of murdering or trying to murder infidels?
Nah. Just like a Muslim stabbing a cop in the neck while screaming
“Allahu akbar” has nothing to do either with terrorism or anarchy; it’s
just a victim of racism giving vent to his frustration. Salmah Rizvi or
some other slick lawyer of that ilk will have young
Camovic back on the streets in no time.
Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a
Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
He is author of 19 books, including the New York Times
bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)
and The Truth About Muhammad.
Stabs NYPD Cop in the Neck:
The Leftist/Jihadist Alliance
in Action
BY ROBERT SPENCER JUN 06, 2020 7:17 PM EST
Dzenan Camovic, 20, allegedly stabbed a NYPD officer in Brooklyn in the neck on Wednesday.
The riots in New York City have now given us two examples of the
Leftist/jihadist alliance: Urooj Rahman, a Muslim lawyer and activist
for the Palestinian jihad, threw a Molotov cocktail into a police cruiser,
and last Wednesday night in Brooklyn, a Muslim migrant from Bosnia
named Dzenan Camovic stabbed a NYPD officer, Yayonfrant Jean Pierre,
in the neck while screaming “Allahu akbar.”
Camovic’s attack was duly woke: he attacked the officer while he was
guarding Brooklyn businesses against looters, and we all know now
that anyone who has the temerity to clean up after the looters, or to
get in their way while they are expressing their righteousness, is a
racist who must be destroyed.
The manner of Camovic’s attack reveals the other side of the alliance.
It is unlikely to have been accidental that he stabbed the police officer
in the neck: the Qur’an tells Muslims, “When you meet the unbelievers,
strike the necks” (47:4). Striking their victims specifically in the neck is,
accordingly, a hallmark of jihadis worldwide.
While jihad attacks by Muslims screaming “Allahu akbar” is an
unfortunately recurring feature of contemporary life, particularly
in Europe, Camovic chose an especially opportune time to attack a
police officer, when amid all the hysterical frenzy over supposed
police “racism,” he could be assured of a legion of sympathetic admirers.
Maybe Salmah Rizvi, a Muslim lawyer who has received a Council on
American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) scholarship and a Soros fellowship
and who guaranteed bail for her “best friend” Urooj Rahman, could take
Camovic’s case and argue that, well, yes, he did attack a police officer
while screaming “Allahu akbar,” but “Allahu akbar” is simply a beautiful
expression of the greatness of God, and as for the attack on police,
well, these racists have it coming, don’t they? For good measure,
Rizvi could even argue that Camovic, a migrant, was simply lashing
out at Trump-era anti-immigrant nativism and fascism.
That kind of defense could have Camovic out on the
street again in no time.
In the meantime, the possibility that Camovic has links to jihad terror
groups is being investigated. Amid that investigation, one of his
relatives, unnamed in a New York Daily News report, is showing
that despite being an immigrant, he or she already knows how to
play the victim card that Islamic advocacy groups and their Leftist
allies in the United States so skillfully and frequently deploy. When
asked about whether Camovic had any ties to terror groups, the
relative responded emphatically: “Absolutely not.” And he laid the
victimhood on thick: “I have the utmost respect for law enforcement,
but it’s easy to accuse a Muslim of terrorism. It’s the first offense
that comes to mind when someone mentions Muslim. He might have
been attacked yesterday. He could have been provoked, and he might
have mentioned, like anyone would mention, God. He might have
said Allah, but no one knows. I just hope law enforcement will do
their due diligence.”
Camovic “could have been provoked, and he might have mentioned,
like anyone would mention, God. He might have said Allah.” Sure, pal.
That’s it. But in reality, there is abundant evidence that “Allahu akbar”
(“Allah is greater,” i.e., superior to your god, your government, and
any other authority) signifies something much more sinister than that.
Chief 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta wrote in his letter to himself before
carrying out his jihad mission: “When the confrontation begins, strike
like champions who do not want to go back to this world.
Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the
non-believers.” The Fort Hood jihad killer, Nidal Malik Hasan, shouted
it as he shot thirteen Americans in November 2009. Numerous other
jihadis have used it essentially as an announcement that non-Muslims
are about to die.
But few people in America today are aware of this. That is in part due
to the establishment media’s full-court press a few years ago to convince
Americans that “Allahu akbar” was a benign phrase that only greasy
Islamophobes could possibly be concerned about.
In the New York Daily News, Zainab Chaudry of Hamas-linked CAIR
argued that non-Muslims shouldn’t “believe the worst” about “Allahu akbar”
because Muslims don’t just scream it while murdering non-Muslims,
but use it in a variety of contexts. She even offered this chilling advice,
certain to get people killed were it ever heeded: “So the next time you
hear Allahu Akbar — whether it’s in a media report, on an airplane,
or in a shopping mall, remember that the phrase used by millions of Muslims
and Christians daily to praise God regardless of their circumstances,
can never be justified for use when harming His creation.” So stay put;
evidently, fleeing would be “Islamophobic.”
On CNN, Omar Suleiman — the imam who prevailed upon Google to alter
their search results so as to bury any negative information about
Islam — also argued that Muslims say “Allahu akbar” in a variety of contexts,
many of them positive. And the New York Times actually tweeted that
the phrase “Allahu akbar” had “somehow” become “intertwined with terrorism.”
Somehow! How could this have possibly happened? Could it have anything
to do with the thousands of Muslims who have screamed “Allahu akbar”
while in the process of murdering or trying to murder infidels?
Nah. Just like a Muslim stabbing a cop in the neck while screaming
“Allahu akbar” has nothing to do either with terrorism or anarchy; it’s
just a victim of racism giving vent to his frustration. Salmah Rizvi or
some other slick lawyer of that ilk will have young
Camovic back on the streets in no time.
Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a
Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
He is author of 19 books, including the New York Times
bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)
and The Truth About Muhammad.
His latest book is The Palestinian Delusion:
The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process.
The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process.
Semper Fidelis
![[Image: SyAa0qj.png]](https://i.imgur.com/SyAa0qj.png)
USMC
USMC
Nemo me impune lacessit