Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
McFadden v. U.S., 576 US _______ - Supreme Ct decision re knowledge of status of RC
#3
(07-26-2015, 04:35 AM)jimtje Wrote: this really only applies to Schedule I and II substances, but since emergency scheduling is popular now as proving all 3 elements has been difficult for AUSAs, you never know and it'd be good to know.

...

This could easily be precedent about a case against our situation by expanding the Analogues Act (which is almost impossible to enforce on individuals, but they did reschedule some Schedule IIIs to IIs so really watch out) or just do a lot more temp schedules.

It is very much in the realm of possibiity. Just this month, the feds charged a redditor for violating the federal analog act by selling a schedule III analog. I think it was a ketamne analog. I feel bad for the kid. Seems like they're gonna crucify him to set some legal precedents.

http://www.nj.com/monmouth/index.ssf/201...uthor.html
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: McFadden v. U.S., 576 US _______ - Supreme Ct decision re knowledge of status of RC - by Sal Paradise - 11-29-2016, 03:24 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)