Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 2,445
» Latest member: Kristofel
» Forum threads: 4,142
» Forum posts: 101,834

Full Statistics

Latest Threads
Daily Thoughts, Random Th...
Forum: The Lounge
Last Post: Orange rabbit
44 minutes ago
» Replies: 1,705
» Views: 770,780
Your favorite inspiration...
Forum: The Lounge
Last Post: Charon
3 hours ago
» Replies: 114
» Views: 3,197
The Music Box
Forum: The Lounge
Last Post: Roses
3 hours ago
» Replies: 2,067
» Views: 114,925
Change one word game
Forum: The Lounge
Last Post: Charon
7 hours ago
» Replies: 225
» Views: 2,395
Hi again!
Forum: Welcome
Last Post: Charon
9 hours ago
» Replies: 1
» Views: 22
On This Day
Forum: World News
Last Post: IceWizard
Yesterday, 01:55 PM
» Replies: 33
» Views: 231
Mylesmeds.net
Forum: IOPList
Last Post: sdfalcons
Yesterday, 12:50 PM
» Replies: 704
» Views: 39,291
Hello all!
Forum: Welcome
Last Post: Budd0413
Yesterday, 05:27 AM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 112
Diazepam or Lorazepam?
Forum: Who's Got It
Last Post: Levi517
Yesterday, 05:03 AM
» Replies: 65
» Views: 4,880
Jon Stewart Shaming Congr...
Forum: World News
Last Post: Traygold
Yesterday, 02:46 AM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 153

 
  Hi again!
Posted by: Kristofel - 10 hours ago - Forum: Welcome - Replies (1)

Hello friends,

Something happend with my old account, only way was to make a new account and username.
Still following the rules and play hide and seek with IceWizard...  Cool


Cheers,
Kristof.  Heart

Print this item

Exclamation John Paul Stevens, long-serving Supreme Court justice, dies at 99
Posted by: IceWizard - 07-17-2019, 09:14 AM - Forum: World News - No Replies

[Image: Toobin-John-Paul-Stevens.jpg]


The bow-tie-wearing justice gained influence over time as he evolved into the court’s most-liberal voice.

By DAVID COHEN
 
07/16/2019 08:48 PM EDT
 
Updated 07/17/2019 12:33 AM EDT




John Paul Stevens, the third-longest serving justice in U.S. Supreme Court history and a court figure whose influence grew markedly over his tenure, has died.

He was 99. The Associated Press reported that he died Tuesday in Florida after suffering a stroke Monday.

December 1975 to June 2010, a term on the court only eclipsed by those of William O. Douglas (1939-75) and Stephen Field (1863-97). At the age of 90, Stevens was the second-oldest justice ever at the time of his retirement, behind only Oliver Wendell Holmes.

“He was not a justice who sought to become a celebrity or to assume the role of legal oracle,” said George Washington Law School professor Jonathan Turley in a 2009 Northwestern University alumni magazine profile.

“He is the quintessential judge — someone who holds to that traditional view that the function of any judge or justice is to decide cases fairly and clearly. His opinions have a distinctly Midwestern character: strong, honest and direct.”


Stevens’ Supreme Court career came at at time of a distinct ideological shift. He was nominated in 1975 by President Gerald Ford as the court was moving away from its most-liberal period, one dominated by such figures as Earl Warren, Hugo Black, William Brennan, Thurgood Marshall and Douglas, the liberal firebrand whom Stevens replaced.

By the time of his retirement in 2010, liberals were hoping that President Barack Obama’s choice of Elena Kagan would help balance a conservative court that had been dominated in recent years by Chief Justice William Rehnquist and his successor, John Roberts, as well as Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.

During those years, Stevens evolved from a centrist and pragmatist to someone who was often the court’s most-liberal voice. His later years were marked by a number of scathing dissents, including in Bush v. Gore, the case that decided the 2000 presidential election, and Citizens United v. FEC, the landmark 2010 election finance case. He also shifted to more liberal positions over the years on affirmative action and the death penalty.




[Image: ?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2...288%29.jpg]
John Paul Stevens chats with John Roberts (right) and Anthony Kennedy (left) at the U.S. Supreme Court in March 2006. | Mark Wilson/Getty Images



“He has served his nation well,” Ford wrote to Fordham Law School in 2005, “at all times carrying out his duties with dignity, intellect and without partisan political concerns. Justice Stevens has made me and our fellow citizens proud of my three-decade-old decision to appoint him to the Supreme Court.”


Even after his tenure ended, he made his voice heard. In 2018, he wrote a much-circulated column for the New York Times urging the repeal of the Second Amendment. He also spoke out against the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. In 2019, the 99-year-old went on the interview circuit to promote his newest book, “The Making of a Justice: Reflections on My First 94 Years.”

Roberts said Tuesday night of Stevens: “A son of the Midwest heartland and a veteran of World War II, Justice Stevens devoted his long life to public service, including 35 years on the Supreme Court. He brought to our bench an inimitable blend of kindness, humility, wisdom, and independence.“

“Justice Stevens was a remarkable man,” tweeted Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas). “He was the leading liberal on the Court & he was brilliant & full of grace & class. Having argued 9 cases before SCOTUS, I can tell you first-hand there was no more dangerous or effective questioner than Justice Stevens.“

President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump also offered condolences in a statement, noting “his passion for the law and our country.”

John Paul Stevens was born April 20, 1920, in Chicago. His father owned the Stevens Hotel, and the young Stevens often had contact there with the celebrities of the day, including aviators Charles Lindbergh and Amelia Earhart.


A lifelong Cubs fan, he was a boyhood witness to one of the most famous moments in baseball history, when Yankees icon Babe Ruth is supposed to have responded to heckling by the Cubs by pointing to the outfield stands and then clouting a World Series home run near that spot.

"Stevens recalled," the Chicago Tribune wrote in 2016, "hearing the heckling coming from the Cubs dugout — particularly the razzing from [pitcher Guy] Bush — and clearly seeing Ruth holding up two fingers in a gesture toward center field."




[Image: ?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2...836%29.jpg]
In 2005, John Paul Stevens throws out the first pitch at a Chicago Cubs game. The lifelong Cubs fan attended World Series games in 1932 and 2016. | Jeff Roberson/AP Photop/align]


Stevens graduated from the University of Chicago in 1941 and Northwestern University Law School six years later, having served as a naval officer in in the interim and earning a Bronze Star during World War II.

After law school, he served as a clerk to Supreme Court Justice Wiley Rutledge, then went into private practice in Chicago. His reputation grew and in 1970, President Richard Nixon tabbed him for the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. “There was a consensus in the legal community,” wrote his biographers in “The Supreme Court Justices: Illustrated Biographies, 1789-1995,” “that Stevens was an unusually able jurist.”

In 1975, a vacancy occurred on the U.S. Supreme Court.
Douglas didn’t want to retire — he detested Ford and didn’t want him to pick his successor — but after a severe stroke in December 1974, his health declined sharply. According to “The Brethren” by Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong, Ford had a list of 10 candidates. He narrowed it down to Stevens and Circuit Court Judge Arlin Adams before settling on Stevens.

“On the basis of a few moments of small talk,” Woodward and Armstrong wrote, “Ford had preferred Stevens. Stevens also seemed to have no partisan politics, no strict ideology. His anonymity would ensure a quick confirmation.”


The confirmation was indeed easy — Stevens was approved by a vote of 98-0. He was sworn in Dec. 19, 1975, little more than a month after Douglas retired. Stevens started quickly, writing the majority opinion in his first case,Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong, a jobs discrimination ruling.

In 1976, he joined the majority in Gregg v. Georgia, a case that allowed the restoration of the death penalty in the United States. It overturned a 1972 verdict in which Douglas had voted the other way.

Two years later, he was part of a fractured majority in the Bakke case, which put the brakes on some affirmative action policies. That same year, he wrote the majority opinion for FCC vs. Pacifica Foundation, upholding an obscenity ruling revolving around the broadcast of a George Carlin comedy routine. In both cases, he voted with the court’s conservatives.

Gradually, though, Stevens became more and more associated with the court’s shrinking liberal wing, though it’s a matter of debate as to whether he changed or whether the court simply outflanked him on the right.



[Image: ?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2...841%29.jpg]
John Paul Stevens waits to testify Dec. 8, 1975, to the Senate. He was unanimously confirmed. | AP Photo




“I don’t think of myself as a liberal at all,” he was quoted as saying in the New York Times in 2007. “I think as part of my general politics, I’m pretty darn conservative.”

A number of his most-prominent opinions certainly can’t be considered liberal. In 1997, he wrote for a unanimous court in Clinton v. Jones, a case that allowed Paula Jones’s lawsuit against Bill Clinton to continue even though he was president. He also wrote the dissents in a pair of cases (Texas v. Johnson, U.S. v. Eichman) that upheld the right to burn an American flag.

Still, Stevens clearly moved to the left on some issues, changing his view on the death penalty — in a 2008 decision, he said he now believed it to be unconstitutional — and affirmative action, forming part of the 5-4 majority in the 2003 Grutter v. Bollinger case.


With the 1994 retirement of Harry Blackmun, he became the senior associate justice, a position that allowed him to assign either the majority or minority opinion in each case. He became known for his ability to use that power to build coalitions in such cases as Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006) and Rasul v. Bush (2004), civil liberties cases resulting from the war on terror. In both cases, the rulings went against the Bush administration.

He was also part of the majority in Lawrence v. Texas (2003), which overturned restrictions on same-sex sexual activity, and wrote the opinion in Atkins v. Virginia (2002) that deemed it unconstitutional to execute mentally handicapped defendants.

“It is largely because of him” wrote the Washington Post’s Charles Lane in 2006, “that a court with seven Republican-appointed members, and nominally headed by a conservative, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, produced a string of relatively liberal results in recent cases.”


Stevens also wrote a number of prominent dissents.

In December 2000, he was on the short end of a 5-4 vote in Bush v. Gore, the decision that ended the legal wrangling over that year’s presidential election. His dissent was scathing: “Time will one day heal the wound to that confidence that will be inflicted by today’s decision. One thing, however, is certain. Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year’s presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation’s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.”

Stevens was also in the minority in the 2010 Citizens United case, which struck down campaign financing restrictions.


His dissent in the 5-4 ruling ran 90 pages: “At bottom, the Court’s opinion is thus a rejection of the common sense of the American people, who have recognized a need to prevent corporations from undermining self-government since the founding, and who have fought against the distinctive corrupting potential of corporate electioneering since the days of Theodore Roosevelt. It is a strange time to repudiate that common sense.”

Through the years, Stevens never attracted much attention from the public.

“The man himself, it is agreed, is quiet and mild-mannered,” wrote “The Supreme Court Justices: Illustrated Biographies, 1789-1995.”

“At one time or another, he has played serious squash, bridge, tennis and golf and flown his own small airplane. He possesses a puckishness that now and then finds its way into his opinions — particularly his concurrences and dissents. Justice Stevens has a fondness for bow ties, which, too, in its way, is a dissenting opinion.”



[Image: ?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2...-staff.JPG]
Justice John Paul Stevens has a gravesite at Arlington National Cemetery, where he is to buried alongside his second wife, Maryan. | POLITICO Staff


After his retirement, Stevens attributed his longevity to one simple thing — having married a dietitian, Maryan Mulholland Stevens in 1979, shortly after his divorce from Elizabeth, his first wife. 

“The most important key to my survival,” Stevens said, “is the advice I’d give to everybody in the room: Marry a beautiful dietitian.” She died in 2015.

Stevens later wrote a book titled “Five Chiefs: A Supreme Court Memoir” that focused on the five chief justices of his professional career, starting with Fred Vinson. It was a low-key book that reflected his great respect for the institution, though not without both praise and pointed criticisms for some of his fellow justices. In 2014, he followed with “Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution.”

Asked in April 2014 on ABC’s “This Week” about his achievements, Stevens offered a mixed view.

“It’s really awfully hard because it’s a series of individual, important events,” he said. “And some are terribly disappointing and some are terribly gratifying. you mix them all together, it’s really hard to pass judgment on the entirety.”


“All I can say, I did the best I could. I didn’t do well enough on many occasions.”

Five years later, NPR’s Nina Totenberg asked Stevens, fresh off a table tennis game in his Florida condo, to elaborate on his overriding judicial policy.

"I'm a person who plays Ping-Pong once in a while," he told her.



[Image: cbsn-fusion-reitred-supreme-court-justic...40x360.jpg]

Print this item

  Fruit Juice and Sugary Drinks and Cancer
Posted by: Charon - 07-12-2019, 10:21 PM - Forum: Diet And Supplements - Replies (3)

A small glass of juice or soda a day is linked to increased risk of cancer, study finds
By Nina Avramova, CNN

Updated 8:23 AM ET, Fri July 12, 2019
Cancer: The facts

*Many my age would drink TAB. a diet coke thing. So I am glad to see that having TAB would not have been a factor in my good sis beating colorectal in 99. And they told us that diet drinks were dangerous.

And my nephew was told if he drank any more Red Bull, cuz he is con ed and works a lot, that it would be his final act. he is barely thirty. These things are dangerous.





(CNN)There's more bad news for fans of sugary drinks such as soda and fruit juice.

A new study has linked drinking just a small glass of a sugary drink per day -- 100 ml, about a third of a typical can of soda -- to an 18% increase in overall cancer risk and a 22% increase in risk for breast cancer.
The research, which looked at more than 100,000 French adults, links consumption of sugary drinks to an increased risk of some cancers. This follows a recent study linking sugary beverage consumption to greater risk of premature death.

It's not just soda: Drinking too much fruit juice (or any sugary drink) linked to premature death risk
"The results indicate statistically significant correlations between the consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and risk of all cancers combined, and of breast cancer," said Ian Johnson, nutrition researcher and emeritus fellow, Quadram Institute Bioscience, who wasn't involved in the research.

"Surprisingly perhaps, the increased risk of cancer in heavier consumers of sugary drinks was observed even among consumers of pure fruit juice -- this warrants more research," Johnson told the Science Media Centre in the UK.

Mathilde Touvier, lead author of the study which was published Wednesday in medical journal BMJ, said that the findings added to research showing that reducing how many sweetened beverages we drink would be beneficial for our health.

"What we observed was that the main driver of the association seems to be really the sugar contained in these sugary drinks," said Touvier, who is the research director of the Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team of the National Health and Medical Research Institute at the Paris 13 University.

Physician groups call for taxes and regulations on kids' access to sugary drinks
Touvier said her team observed that sugar seemed to be the main driver of the link.
"High sugary drinks consumption is a risk factor for obesity and weight gain," she said, and, "obesity is in itself a risk factor for cancer."

Another possibility is that additives, such as 4-methylimidazole, which is found in drinks that contain caramel coloring, could play a role in cancer formation.
Touvier suggested that people should stick to public health guidelines that recommend limiting sugary drinks to a maximum of one glass a day.

Responding to the study, the American Beverage Association stressed the safety of sugary drinks.
"It's important for people to know that all beverages -- either with sugar or without are safe to consume as part of a balanced diet," Danielle Smotkin, a spokeswoman for the American Beverage Association said in a statement.

"That said, America's leading beverage companies are working together to support consumer' efforts to reduce the sugar they consume from our beverages by providing more choices with less sugar or zero sugar, smaller package sizes and clear calorie information right up front."
No link found with diet sodas

One-month sugar detox: A nutritionist explains how and why

The research found no link between diet beverages and cancer. The authors warned that this finding should be interpreted with caution, as this type of beverage had a relatively low consumption among the study participants.

A study published earlier this year found that drinking two or more of any kind of artificially sweetened drink a day was linked to an increased risk of clot-based strokes, heart attacks and early death in women over 50.

However, Catherine Collins, a dietician in the UK's National Health Service, said that the absence of cancer risk in using diet drinks was the "take-home message" of the research.
"For too long the nutri-myth of sweeteners being a health risk has remained in popular culture," she told the Science Media Centre in the UK.

"All current sweeteners in use have been through rigorous safety testing before being acceptable for human use," said Collins, who was not involved in the study.
'There is more work to be done'

For the new study, the research team looked at 101,257 healthy French adults -- 79% women and 21% men who participated in the ongoing French NutriNet-Santé study.

Participants, who were on average 42 years old, filled out at least two questionnaires and were followed over a nine-year period. Their consumption of sugary drinks was gauged by participants submitting at least two 24-hour diet recall questionnaires, which asked about their usual intake of 3,300 different food and drink items.



What we aren't eating is killing us, global study finds

Daily consumption of sugary drinks -- sugar-sweetened beverages and 100% fruit juices -- and artificially sweetened or diet beverages were calculated and first cases of cancer reported by participants were validated by medical records and linked with health insurance national databases.
On average, men consumed more sugary drinks than women -- 90.3 ml daily compared to 74.6 ml. Risk factors for cancer, such as age, sex, educational level, family history of cancer, smoking status and physical activity, were considered in the study.

During the study's follow-up period, a total of 2,193 first cases of cancer were diagnosed, at the average age of 59 years. Of these, 693 were breast cancers, 291 were prostate cancer cases and 166 were colorectal cancers.

However, this study is observational and doesn't show cause and effect.
That's a major limitation, researchers say, as it's impossible to determine whether the association is due to a type of beverage or another hidden health issue.

Get CNN Health's weekly newsletter
Sign up here to get The Results Are In with Dr. Sanjay Gupta every Tuesday from the CNN Health team.

"While this study doesn't offer a definitive causative answer about sugar and cancer, it does add to the overall picture of the importance of the current drive to reduce our sugar intake," said Amelia Lake, reader in public health nutrition at Teesside University.

"Clearly there is more work to be done and measuring dietary intake is challenging, however, the message from the totality of evidence on excess sugar consumption and various health outcomes is clear -- reducing the amount of sugar in our diet is extremely important," Lake told the Science Media Centre in the UK. She was not involved in the current study.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/10/health/su...index.html

Print this item

Wink Hello
Posted by: Catgirl - 07-11-2019, 11:09 PM - Forum: Welcome - Replies (4)

Hello.  I have been a member for a while but just started posting the past month or two.

Print this item

  Phentermine
Posted by: Catgirl - 07-11-2019, 10:54 PM - Forum: Who's Got It - Replies (2)

Any suggests on where to look for it?

Print this item

  quick question about post count
Posted by: Parapluie - 07-11-2019, 05:52 PM - Forum: Suggestions & Technical - Replies (3)

Hello!

Outside issues kept me away for a bit--hoping that they won't return--but in any case, my post count has reached a certain number, but the site doesn't seem to have responded. Am I looking in the wrong place, or have I possibly done something wrong.  Looking around I recall a post or two about this but may have misread them: I was left the impression that the change would be automatic.

Pardon me, this is worded very badly, I'm just confused.

But glad to be back!

Print this item

  RIP TORN DEAD AT 88
Posted by: IceWizard - 07-11-2019, 09:34 AM - Forum: World News - No Replies

7/9/2019 8:53 PM PT

[Image: be526dafc7054b25a3423c8ee1f1ffe9_md.jpg]


Rip Torn, Emmy-winning actor and comedian, is dead.

Rip, perhaps best known for his role as Artie on HBO's "The Larry Sanders Show," died Tuesday. 

No cause of death has been released yet. 

He won an Emmy for his 'Larry Sanders' role, and was nominated 6 more times for it. He was also an Oscar nominee in 1984 for "Cross Creek." 


Rip made his film debut in the 1956 film "Baby Doll." From there, he began a prolific and decades-long career on stage and screen.


Torn's work on "The Larry Sanders Show" garnered him a whole new generation of fans, who would go on to enjoy his character work as Zed in the first two 'Men in Black' films. He also had memorable roles on "Will & Grace" and "30 Rock."

His full name was Elmore Rual Torn Jr. ... but he started going by the nickname Rip when he was a kid. Fun fact ... his cousin is iconic actress Sissy Spacek.

He is survived by his wife Amy, his 6 kids, his sister Patricia, and his 4 grandchildren.
Rip was 88. 





[Image: rip2.jpg?quality=85&strip=all&w=400&h=225&crop=1]


RIP


Print this item

  World Meters
Posted by: IceWizard - 07-11-2019, 09:05 AM - Forum: World News - No Replies

If you are one of those that like to know just how much "stuff" is going on
at any given minute.... This may be what you're looking for...

Like :::
Current World Population
Births this year
Births today
Deaths this year
Deaths today
Net population growth this year
Net population growth today
Public Healthcare expenditure today
Cars produced this year
Money spent on videogames today

....And much much more



World of Meters

Print this item

  Hello
Posted by: argondizzam - 07-11-2019, 04:41 AM - Forum: Welcome - Replies (5)

Hello guys. Thanks for approving my account. Hopefully looking to have some good experiences here.

Print this item

  Where is everyone?
Posted by: Orange rabbit - 07-07-2019, 11:48 PM - Forum: The Lounge - Replies (10)

Noticed not many people posting.   If your on vacation I’m jealous.

OR

Print this item